Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

• Describe the principles of measuring outcomes in primary care and their relevance to genetic carrier screening.
• Explain the concept of a mini-audit and its application in a general practice setting.
• Identify key indicators for measuring outcomes related to genetic carrier screening.
• Design a simple mini-audit to assess their practice's performance in offering genetic carrier screening.
• Implement a mini-audit in their practice and collect relevant data.
• Analyse audit data and interpret the results to identify areas for improvement.
• Develop an action plan to implement changes in their practice based on audit findings. 

This workshop is designed to meet the learning outcomes through interactive and practical methods, aligning with RACGP Standard 3, "CPD activities are designed to achieve the learning outcomes." A specialist GP with expertise in quality improvement and genetic health will provide focused presentations on the principles of measuring outcomes and the application of mini-audits in primary care. This ensures the content is evidence-based and relevant, aligning with Criterion 3.3. The presentations will be structured to provide participants with the knowledge and skills to design and implement a mini-audit. Participants will engage in discussions to explore the relevance of measuring outcomes to their practice and to brainstorm potential audit topics and indicators. This encourages active participation and peer learning, aligning with Criterion 3.1. Participants will work in small groups to design a mini-audit for a specific aspect of genetic carrier screening in primary care (e.g., the proportion of eligible patients offered screening). This hands-on activity allows participants to apply the learned concepts and develop a practical audit plan, directly addressing the learning outcomes (Criterion 3.2). A real-world case study will be used to demonstrate the process of implementing, analysing, and interpreting a mini-audit. This provides a practical example and helps participants understand how to use audit results to improve their practice. Participants will receive templates and tools to support the implementation of mini-audits in their practice, such as audit plan templates, data collection forms, and analysis tools. The selection of these methods is justified by their effectiveness in achieving the learning outcomes, which focus on developing practical skills in measuring outcomes. The workshop format allows for interactive learning, group work, and hands-on activities, which are essential for skill development. The assessment methods are fit for purpose, as the learning outcomes focus on the ability to design and implement a mini-audit, which is best achieved through practical application and group work (Criterion 3.4). The program plan includes details of facilitators, interactive elements, and resource provision, further demonstrating alignment with Criterion 3.2.

This evaluation strategy is designed to assess the effectiveness of the workshop and ensure ongoing quality improvement, aligning with RACGP Standard 4, "Evaluation strategy informs quality improvement of the CPD activity." Participants will complete evaluation forms to provide feedback on the relevance of the content, the effectiveness of the delivery methods, and the likelihood of applying the learned strategies in their practice. This incorporates a range of perspectives (participant feedback) in the data collection, as required by Criterion 4.1, and provides valuable insights into the participant experience. The evaluation forms will include open-ended questions to collect detailed comments on what participants found most useful and areas for improvement, particularly regarding the practicality of the mini-audit tools and the clarity of the implementation guidance. The qualitative data will be analysed to identify areas where the program can be strengthened and refined for future iterations, with a focus on improving the practicality and usefulness of the mini-audit resources and guidance. This analysis will form the basis of quality improvement (QI) recommendations. The evaluation process, including the methodology and data collection methods, will be documented, and the evaluation data will be provided to those involved in the activity's development and delivery, fulfilling the requirements of Criterion 4.1. Furthermore, the analysis of evaluation data will directly inform quality improvement of the CPD activity, as specified in Criterion 4.2. The evaluation report, including QI recommendations, will be provided to the RACGP. Evidence of changes made to the activity as a result of evaluation data will be documented and provided to the RACGP, demonstrating a commitment to continuous quality improvement. Examples of potential changes include modifying the mini-audit templates or tools based on feedback regarding their usability, revising the implementation guidance to address any challenges or barriers identified by participants, and adjusting the program's focus or scope based on feedback regarding its relevance to general practice. By systematically collecting and analysing evaluation data and using it to drive improvements, we ensure that the CPD activity remains relevant, effective, and aligned with the needs of GPs, meeting the requirements of RACGP Standard 4.

The program will encourage participants to consider how socioeconomic factors, geographic location, and other social determinants of health may create inequalities in access to genetic carrier screening. Participants will be prompted to include indicators in their mini-audits that assess for equitable access to genetic carrier screening across different patient groups and to develop strategies to address any identified disparities.

The program will reinforce the professional responsibility of GPs to provide high-quality, evidence-based care, including the appropriate use of genetic carrier screening. Measuring outcomes is presented as a tool to enhance professional practice and ensure accountability to patients.

The program will encourage participants to consider ethical principles related to informed consent, patient autonomy, and equitable access to genetic information when designing and implementing their mini-audits.